Changing Education Is Not Anti Education

When you challenge the way education has always been done, people get uncomfortable. I learned that quickly when I started the Disrupt Education Podcast. The goal was never to attack schools, teachers, or learning itself. The goal was to move education forward so students are better prepared to become professionals and productive members of their communities. Somewhere along the way, that message got twisted. Pushing for change became labeled as being anti education. That label is not only inaccurate, it is harmful to real progress.

Anti education is about rejection. It dismisses the value of learning, undermines the role of educators, and questions whether education matters at all. That mindset walks away from responsibility and ignores the impact schools have on students, families, and communities. If you believe education is essential to opportunity and growth, you are not anti education. You are invested in it.

Changing education is about evolution. It is about asking hard questions because the stakes are high. It is about challenging outdated practices not to tear them down, but to improve them. Every meaningful profession evolves over time. Medicine changes. Technology changes. Business changes. Education must change too if it is going to remain relevant and effective for the students sitting in our classrooms today.

The confusion often comes from fear.

When long standing systems are questioned, people hear criticism even when the intent is improvement. When conversations shift toward experiential learning, internships, portfolios, and durable skills, it can feel like a dismissal of past practices. That is not the message. The message is that what has been built matters so much that we cannot allow it to fall behind the world our students are entering.

Disruption is not destruction.

Disruption is an intentional interruption of patterns that no longer serve their purpose. It is about refining, rebuilding, and sometimes redesigning systems so they better align with reality. We are not anti school. We are anti irrelevance. We are not anti teacher. We are anti systems that limit teacher creativity and student growth. We are not anti tradition. We are anti tradition without reflection.

Students are already living in a changed world. They collaborate digitally, learn through experience, and build skills outside of classrooms every day. When school ignores that reality, education loses credibility. Changing education means connecting learning to life so students can move from classrooms into careers with confidence, clarity, and purpose. That is not anti education. That is education at its best.

If pushing for better outcomes, deeper learning, and more meaningful experiences earns the label anti education, then the label is missing the point. Standing still while the world moves forward is not loyalty to education. It is abandonment. I am not anti education. I am anti complacency.

And I will keep pushing for change because education is worth improving.

‍